Web Pentest Project

Web Application Pentest Engagement Resume Project Example

A scoped web application penetration test that mapped authentication flows in Burp Suite, exploited OWASP Top 10 findings including IDOR and XSS, and delivered a remediation-ready report with proof-of-concept evidence.

Burp SuiteOWASP Top 10Manual TestingPentest Report

Free to start · No credit card required

ELENA ROSSI

Penetration Tester

96% ATS matchATS

Project

Web app pentest

OWASP-mapped
Burp SuiteOWASP Top 10Manual TestingNmapMarkdown Report
  • Tested a SPA for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
  • Chained IDOR and XSS findings in Burp Suite.
  • Delivered executive and technical pentest reports.

Why this project is valuable

Core pentest signal

Web app engagements show manual testing skill, Burp Suite fluency, and report writing hiring managers expect from junior-to-mid pentesters.

Good ATS coverage

Supports Burp Suite, OWASP Top 10, web application security, penetration testing, and vulnerability assessment keywords.

Clear deliverable focus

PoC evidence and remediation guidance connect findings to client action—not just scanner output.

Good interview depth

Discuss scope rules, auth bypass attempts, chaining findings, and how you validated false positives.

Project overview

A web application pentest engagement is strong penetration tester resume material because it demonstrates end-to-end offensive testing from recon through reporting—not SOC alert triage.

Testing followed OWASP Testing Guide phases: Burp Suite proxied authenticated sessions, manual parameter tampering uncovered IDOR on account APIs, stored XSS persisted through profile fields, and findings were scored with CVSS and mapped to OWASP Top 10 categories in the final report.

On a resume, that gives you ways to describe scope boundaries, Burp Repeater and Intruder usage, evidence screenshots, retest validation, and executive summaries that non-technical stakeholders could act on.

Architecture overview

Project flow
1Scope

Scope and rules of engagement

Defined in-scope URLs, test accounts, and forbidden actions before any active testing.

2Recon

Recon and mapping

Burp Spider and manual browsing catalogued routes, parameters, and authentication flows.

3Test

Authenticated testing

Session-aware testing in Burp Proxy targeted access control and input validation flaws.

4Exploit

Exploitation and chaining

IDOR plus XSS chain demonstrated realistic account takeover impact with PoC steps.

5Document

Evidence collection

Screenshots, HTTP transcripts, and CVSS scores captured per finding for the report.

6Report

Report delivery

Technical and executive report sections with remediation priority and retest criteria.

What this project includes

  • Rules of engagement and scope documentation
  • Burp Suite authenticated session testing
  • OWASP Top 10 finding identification
  • PoC evidence with CVSS scoring
  • Executive and technical pentest report
  • Retest validation criteria for fixes

Tech stack

Web pentest stacks center on Burp Suite and manual methodology—not SIEM dashboards or detection engineering.

Burp SuiteOWASP Top 10Manual TestingNmapBrowser DevToolsPentest Report Template

Burp Suite

Proxies traffic, replays requests, and automates targeted fuzzing on parameters.

OWASP Top 10

Frames finding categories and testing checklist coverage for the engagement.

Manual Testing

Validates logic flaws scanners miss, especially access control and business rules.

Nmap

Confirms exposed services and TLS configuration on supporting infrastructure.

Browser DevTools

Inspects client-side storage, cookies, and DOM behavior for XSS validation.

Pentest Report Template

Structures executive summary, methodology, findings, and remediation appendix.

Features implemented

Authenticated coverage

Tests run with realistic user roles to expose IDOR and privilege issues.

OWASP-mapped findings

Each vulnerability ties to a Top 10 category for client familiarity.

PoC reproducibility

Step-by-step Burp transcripts let developers retest fixes quickly.

CVSS prioritization

Scores guide remediation order beyond subjective severity labels.

Executive summary

Non-technical risk framing complements deep technical appendices.

Retest criteria

Clear pass/fail conditions for validation after patches ship.

Resume bullet examples

These bullets frame work as offensive web testing—not blue-team SIEM operations.

  • Conducted a scoped web application penetration test using Burp Suite, identifying OWASP Top 10 findings including IDOR on account APIs and stored XSS in profile fields.
  • Chained access-control and XSS vulnerabilities into a proof-of-concept account takeover scenario documented with HTTP transcripts and CVSS scoring.
  • Delivered executive and technical pentest reports with remediation guidance, retest criteria, and evidence screenshots mapped to OWASP categories.
  • Validated scanner false positives through manual parameter tampering and session-aware testing beyond automated crawl coverage.
Generate bullets from your project

Skills demonstrated

This project demonstrates web application penetration testing, Burp Suite, and professional reporting.

Offensive

Burp SuiteOWASP Top 10IDORXSS

Methodology

manual testingscope rulesPoC developmentCVSS

Delivery

pentest reportsexecutive summaryretest validationevidence collection

ATS keywords extracted from this project

Use pentest and OWASP keywords—not SIEM or detection engineering terms.

penetration testingBurp SuiteOWASP Top 10web application securityIDORXSSmanual testingpentest reportCVSSvulnerability assessmentpenetration testerproof of concept

Interview questions based on this project

Web pentest projects lead to methodology and chaining questions.

How did you approach authenticated testing?

I proxied login flows in Burp, maintained role-specific sessions, and replayed requests with swapped object IDs to test access control across accounts.

What was your highest-impact finding?

IDOR on a profile API combined with stored XSS let one user inject script executed in another user's session—a realistic takeover chain.

How did you reduce false positives?

Every scanner hit was manually reproduced in Repeater with evidence before inclusion in the report.

How would you improve the engagement?

Add OAuth/OIDC flow testing and race-condition checks on password reset endpoints.

Common mistakes

SIEM or SOC framing

Describe Burp Suite testing and pentest reports—not log analysis or detections.

Scanner-only narrative

Manual validation and chaining show real pentest skill.

No scope mention

Rules of engagement prove professional testing discipline.

Missing report deliverable

Clients hire pentesters for findings plus remediation guidance.

FAQ

Is a web app pentest a good penetration tester resume project?

Yes. Web testing is the most common entry path into professional penetration testing roles.

Do I need a paid Burp license?

Community Edition works for portfolio labs; document manual techniques honestly.

Should I mention OWASP Top 10?

Yes. Mapping findings to Top 10 categories is standard client language.

How many bullets should I use?

Two to four bullets on testing methodology, findings, chaining, and reporting.

Turn project details into resume evidence

Use this web app pentest to strengthen your penetration tester resume

Present Burp Suite methodology, OWASP findings, and recruiter-friendly pentest reporting with stronger keyword alignment.

Free to start · No credit card required